Memo commission case: SC gives Hussain Haqqani three-week time to return

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court of Pakistan (SC) on Monday dismissed the plea of Hussain Haqqani for exemption from personal appearance in the court and gave a final chance to him to appear before the court with a warning that if he failed to appear a stern action will be taken against him, Dispatch News Desk (DND) reported.

A nine-member larger bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry was hearing into the controversy revolving around the memo scandal after the judicial commission constituted by the Supreme Court had held that Haqqani was the originator and architect of the memorandum sent to former US military chief Admiral Mike Mullen seeking US intervention to avert a possible overthrow of the civilian government by the military.

The counsel for Hussain Haqqani Asma Jahangir had submitted a petition praying for the grant of exemption to her client due to security concerns, which the court rejected and ordered him to make his presence within three weeks in the court, otherwise his passport might be cancelled.

The Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry in his remarks said that Hussain Haqqani must honour the affidavit he had submitted in the court. The Chief Justice further said that the security measures taken by the democratic government are praise worthy.

The court in its order said that if Haqqani failed to appear before the court he must be brought forcibly and that there are a number of options before the court including the cancellation of his passport.

DND

READ  President Zardari’s immunity will end at midnight, says Aitzaz Ahsan

1 COMMENT

  1. The latest development where former Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz has also been allowed to testify via video-link smacks of unequal treatment. Moreover, if the CJ carries out his warning of coercive action against Mr Haqqani, which would include the cancellation of his passport, the question asked in the national and international media and diplomatic circles would be about the legal justification for the act. Ok, one can accept that Shaukat Azizi is ex-premier of Pakistan so he was facilitated( Although for law every one is equal) but why Mansoor Ejaz was facilitated, now if we have two lucid examples then why SC is differentiating between these two and Hussain Haqqani? Law should be same for everyone.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.