Home Blog

Thousands of students detained ahead of Delhi’s Jantar Mantar protest planned on October 10

Monitoring Desk: Over 5,000 students have been arrested throughout India as they were travelling to Delhi’s Jantar Mantar for the October 10 protest, reports India media.

Police are present at intercity bus stands, railway stations, and even at rental car points across more than 200 cities throughout India, managing to stop young people from travelling towards the Indian capital. The heavy government crackdown is supported by legal barriers, as courts are not providing relief to arrested persons, and their bail applications are being rejected ahead of October 10, 2026.

It may be remembered that the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) will hold a fresh protest on October 10 at Jantar Mantar in **Delhi** if Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar does not resign over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke announced this on Friday, saying that the deletion of votes from electoral rolls targets minorities, with Muslim voters being the biggest victims.

Joint Commissioner of Police Nupur Prasad officially announced that Delhi Police had denied permission for the Cockroach Janta Party’s (CJP) October 10 demonstration. Authorities cited a failure to meet the mandatory 10-day advance notice requirement and noted that the group had breached compliance terms during previous agitations.

The Delhi High Court refused an urgent hearing requested by the Indian Youth Congress (IYC), which sought to challenge restrictions and secure legal clearance for the Jantar Mantar protest. The bench deferred the matter to October 12, effectively bypassing the protest date.

The central government has deployed 221 Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) companies, totalling roughly 23,000 personnel, along with additional female paramilitary forces, to heavily fortify Delhi’s borders and sensitive central areas.

Prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the BNSS (banning unlawful assemblies) are strictly in place near Jantar Mantar. In an unusual preventive measure, the Delhi government ordered all liquor stores to shut down on October 9 and 10 to maintain public order.

Frontline organisers, including CJP co-convener Ashutosh Ranka, have taken to social media to allege widespread state detentions. CJP leadership claims that thousands of young volunteers travelling from states such as Telangana, Pune, and Rajasthan have been intercepted by regional police forces en route to Delhi.

Despite the bans and security clampdowns, CJP leaders such as Saurav Das and founder Abhijeet Dipke maintain that the protest will go ahead peacefully. Organisers have stated that if the police halt their march, whatever location they are stopped at will dynamically transform into their new protest site.

Almost all major universities in India are facing distress as the BJP has allegedly ordered RSS activists to attack students who are planning to reach Delhi on October 10. The RSS has also started holding Vande Mataram seminars at Indian universities to encourage Hindu students to demonstrate their strength, sending a message to minority students that the RSS can make their lives miserable if it so wishes. The Central University of Kerala has suspended five students over protests against a Vande Mataram seminar organised in association with an RSS-affiliated organisation. Protesters accused the administration of saffronising the campus.

Advertisement

PTI Long March: Terrorism cannot be defeated through ambiguity

Editorial

The Federal Government and the ruling PML-N coalition have once again extended an olive branch to the PTI for dialogue, urging the party to relinquish its politics of disruption and chaos. As has become customary, the PTI summarily rejected the offer. Since the inception of these proposed talks, political analysts have questioned the prudence of the government’s approach.

Engaging in dialogue with a faction perceived to endorse violent extremists, such as the TTP, risks sowing public confusion, leaving citizens to wonder whether the PTI operates as a legitimate political entity invested in the nation’s welfare, or as a cult influenced by the Afghan Taliban regime and hostile actors. Conversely, government circles maintain that politics is the art of the possible, arguing there was no harm in seeking a breakthrough for the collective good of the state.

Objective observers in Pakistan have compelling reasons to argue that the PTI neither conducts itself as a democratic party nor prioritizes national cohesion. As Pakistan reaches a critical juncture in its counter-terrorism campaign, the state must decisively address the PTI’s trajectory once and for all. On the war on terror, the PTI has consistently propagated a narrative that the conflict was externally imposed and fought merely for financial assistance. In truth, this struggle represents an existential battle for the survival of the Pakistani populace. Consequently, the PTI’s actions stand in stark contrast to the state’s counter-terrorism operations, effectively aligning with the policies of the TTP and the Afghan Taliban regime. It is imperative to demand accountability: why has this war not reached its logical conclusion despite monumental national sacrifices? The answer is plain: under various pretexts, the PTI lacks the political will to confront the TTP and its affiliates.

The PTI frequently deploys the rhetoric: “How does terrorism proliferate when security forces fortify the borders?” This dilemma must be analyzed accurately. No degree of border enforcement can resolve the crisis so long as the PTI leadership looks to Afghanistan rather than Pakistan for solutions. The fundamental flaw is that the PTI prioritizes Kabul over Islamabad; national interest dictates that Islamabad should have been the anchor of their security policy and political narrative.

The time is ripe for the resilient people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to look inward toward Islamabad, Peshawar, Charsadda, and Waziristan, rather than outward toward Kabul, Paktika, Kandahar, or Khost. Decades of cross-border volatility have yielded nothing but the scourge of terrorism, illicit smuggling, the rise of the TTP, economic destabilization, and organized crime. Afghanistan remains a core component of the crisis, not its solution.

The citizens of Pakistan, particularly the residents of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa vehemently refuse to coexist with the menace of the TTP but a 13-year period of PTI influence, during which terrorism, the TTP (Khawarij), and their facilitators expanded their footprint. The situation demands individuals who will confront this menace shoulder-to-shoulder with the public and the armed forces, acting with unyielding resolve and prioritizing the sovereign interests of Pakistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa above all else.

Patriotic citizens firmly believe that the era of appeasement and compromise has expired. The only viable path forward is an uncompromised offensive against terrorists and any entities that facilitate them such as PTI. While political maneuvering holds weight in a democracy, the survival and sovereignty of the state must remain paramount.

 

Advertisement

KP police in shamble while public resources spend on political activities

Monitoring Desk: Serious questions have been raised over the performance of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)-led government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) amid allegations of negligence, inadequate resources, staff shortages and weak operational preparedness in the provincial police force, which remains on the front lines of the fight against terrorism, report several social media accounts.

According to details provided regarding the force’s operational capacity, the provincial Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD), despite comprising more than 3,300 personnel, has access to only 17 bulletproof vehicles. The figures also indicate that only 25 CTD employees hold permanent positions, while the remaining personnel work on temporary contracts.

The provincial police force is reportedly facing a shortage of 9,000 personnel, while more than 13,000 police officers from a total force of 125,000 are deployed for VIP security and protocol duties. The condition of the force’s armoured vehicles has also emerged as a concern, with allegations that outdated vehicles have not been upgraded to meet the requirements of modern counterterrorism operations.

The provincial government’s allocation and release of funds for security infrastructure have also come under scrutiny. The police had reportedly sought Rs42 billion to strengthen sensitive check-posts, but the provincial government released only Rs1.2 billion, raising questions about the adequacy of funding for security installations operating in a terrorism-affected province.

Concerns have also been expressed over the utilisation of funds allocated to the CTD. Of the Rs844 million budget reportedly allocated to the department, only Rs311.8 million was utilised, indicating a significant gap between the approved allocation and actual expenditure.

The slow pace of procurement of modern forensic equipment and drones has further raised concerns about the department’s ability to strengthen intelligence-led operations, evidence collection and surveillance against terrorist networks.

The allegations also point to questions regarding the allocation of resources intended to maintain law and order in tribal districts and merged areas, with claims that security resources have been diverted towards political interests. These allegations have intensified criticism of the provincial government’s priorities at a time when law enforcement agencies face persistent security challenges.

Professional training and operational preparedness have also emerged as areas of concern. Between January and August 2025, only 59 CTD personnel reportedly received training, highlighting questions about the pace of capacity-building within the specialised counterterrorism force.


Meanwhile, although Rs1,776.5 million was reportedly approved for the training of the Levies force, concerns remain over the availability of essential weapons and equipment required for field operations. The reported disparity between training allocations and operational preparedness has raised questions about the effective utilisation of public funds and the practical readiness of personnel deployed in the field.

The reported shortcomings have fuelled criticism of the PTI-led provincial government’s handling of police administration and counterterrorism preparedness. Critics argue that staff shortages, inadequate protective vehicles, limited training and delays in acquiring modern equipment could undermine the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies confronting terrorism. With Khyber Pakhtunkhwa continuing to face serious security challenges, the issues surrounding police resources, financial management and operational readiness have placed renewed focus on the provincial government’s responsibility to strengthen the force, ensure transparent utilisation of security funds and provide personnel with the equipment and training required to perform their duties.

Advertisement

Pakistan trapped in poverty by political compromises, failed governance and broken tax system

Editorial

The World Bank report on poverty released on October 6, 2026, claims that Pakistan stands with Afghanistan, Djibouti, Syria, and Yemen, where people are living below a $3 per day income. According to the report, Pakistan accounts for about 48% of the people in the region living below the $3 per day (about Rs840 daily income) poverty line.

It is the same country where the government collects taxes mostly on consumer goods, such as General Sales Tax, petroleum levies, and electricity surcharges, so every individual has to bear the direct brunt of filling the pocket of the tax collection system. Taxing the rich only is a bygone era in Pakistan.

Even Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif, in the past, accepted that the FBR system is not working, while several ministers accepted that the system had failed and governance had collapsed, but at the same time, they had been providing extra benefits to FBR officials and the federal bureaucracy that, according to the structure, is responsible for governance and is responsible for the failure of governance.

The government seemingly plans to break the net of poverty through other means, such as enhancing FDI and providing opportunities for industrialization, instead of overhauling the FBR and governance, but there it is yet to get results.

SIFC was created to enhance Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Pakistan, but that too faced the fate of problems due to bureaucratic bottlenecks because SIFC can invite investors to Pakistan, which it had been doing well, but investors then face bureaucratic red-tapism at the ground level, from procurement of land to constructing the industries, and the whole such process is in the hands of bureaucrats.

Pakistan has seen a significant decrease in recent years in FDIs. In FY2025-26, FDI fell by 34% to $1.64 billion, with net inflows dropping to $14 million in June.

The agriculture sector is facing uncertainty, and a country that is considered an agrarian society is now importing wheat, cotton, and sugar.

On the other hand, politicians show indifferent, rather insensitive, behaviour by enjoying expensive aircraft for attending wedding ceremonies out of the country and using helicopters for launching protest campaigns against the government.

Once, a positive discussion started that governance could be fixed through forming smaller governing federating units (provinces), but this discussion has also been put under the carpet because politicians are not ready to surrender public money that are using for their pleasure.

A party that always harms state interests through protests and abuses state institutions is still free to play havoc with the public and is still marching towards Islamabad by using public funds of KP.

Once upon a time, there were news reports that this party—PTI—would be fixed and KP would be taken away from the clutches of this party through the use of constitutional power, but this discussion is also just in the air and nothing concrete is visible because the federal government started political negotiations with PTI, although all litmus tests confirmed that this party is harming the country by supporting terrorists such as TTP in the province. What a confusion Pakistan is facing. Confused governance is as harmful as enemies because confusion shatters the trust and confidence of the public in the government. In simple words, Pakistan has been trapped in poverty by political compromises, failed governance and broken tax system.

 

Advertisement

Pakistan stands with Afghanistan, Djibouti, Syria, and Yemen where people are living below $3 per day income, reports World Bank

Monitoring Desk: Pakistan stands with Djibouti, Syria, and Yemen where people are living below $3 per day income, said World Bank in report released on October 6, 2026.

According to report, Pakistan accounts for about 48% of the people in the region living below the $3 per day (about Rs840 daily income) poverty line while remaining poor people were concentrated in Afghanistan, Syria, and Yemen which together accounted for another 47% of people living below the poverty line of $3 per day income.

The latest World Bank Group estimates showed that the region (MENAAP) accounts for 14% of the world’s extreme poor, second only to Sub-Saharan Africa. After declining substantially during the 2000s and 2010s, poverty reduction stalled around 2019 and reversed following the COVID-19 pandemic. The report said that the regional increase in poverty was driven primarily by a rise in poverty in Pakistan, where the poverty rate rose by 6.4 percentage points at the $3 per day line and 3.2 percentage points at the $4.2 per day line between 2018-19 and 2024-25 following a succession of adverse shocks, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the devastating 2022 floods, a macroeconomic crisis marked by high inflation and currency depreciation, and a prolonged period of economic adjustment that weakened real household incomes and employment opportunities.

 

Advertisement

Russian company “TEXHOTEKC,” will invest in Afghanistan’s agriculture sector and chemical fertilizer production

DND News: Russian company “TEXHOTEKC,” will invest in Afghanistan’s agriculture sector and chemical fertilizer production, reports Afghan media.

In a meeting held in Kabul between Sadr Azam Osmani, Deputy Minister of Agriculture, Irrigation and Livestock of Afghanistan with Adamyan Suren Rachikovich, CEO of the TEXHOTEKC, it was decided that Russian company will export chemical fertilizers to Afghanistan, while in the next phase, a chemical fertilizer production factory will be established in Afghanistan.

According to business circles in Kabul, the Russian governments wants to bridge Afghan Taliban’s regime in all sectors where Afghanistan is facing problems due suspension of trade with Pakistan that was sole provider of fertilizer to Afghanistan in past. Business circles maintained that Russia will soon start sending fertilizers to Afghanistan via Uzbekistan that is nearest route for Russian trade to Afghanistan and that is already supporting Kabul to establish trade globally through Uzbekistan land routes.

Advertisement

Pakistan successful test launches extended version of Fatah-4, Ground Launched Cruise Missile

Islamabad: Pakistan today conducted a successful test launch of indigenously developed extended version of Fatah-4, Ground Launched Cruise Missile. Equipped with advanced avionics and state of the art navigational aids, the weapon system is capable of engaging targets at extended ranges with high precision and lethality, reports DND News Agency from Islamabad. 

The test also validated additional technical parameters of various sub-systems incorporated for improved accuracy and enhanced survivability.

Today’s launch was witnessed by senior officers from Pakistan Army along with scientists and engineers of developing agency.

The President, Prime Minister of Pakistan, Chief of Army Staff & Chief of Defence Forces and Services Chiefs commended successful test launch of Fatah-4 Extended Version and appreciated the technical prowess, dedication and commitment of all those who contributed towards achieving this milestone.

Advertisement

ICC reaffirms follow-up on arrest warrants against Afghan Taliban Amir Haibatullah Akhundzada

Monitoring Desk: The Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has welcomed the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber II to unseal four arrest warrants issued against senior Afghan Taliban leaders, reaffirming that the Court’s action against Taliban Amir Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada and other senior officials remains an active judicial process.

ICC reaffirms follow-up on arrest warrants against Afghan Taliban Amir Haibatullah Akhundzada

In its latest statement issued on October 6, the ICC Office of the Prosecutor said Pre-Trial Chamber II had unsealed four warrants of arrest issued in the Situation in Afghanistan on July 8, 2025 and September 9, 2025, concerning the crime against humanity of persecution on gender and political grounds.

The development follows the ICC Prosecutor’s applications for arrest warrants against senior Taliban leadership over alleged persecution of Afghan women, girls and other persons who do not conform to the Taliban’s policies concerning gender, gender identity or expression.

On January 23, 2025, the Office of the Prosecutor submitted its first two applications for warrants of arrest against the Supreme Leader of the Taliban, Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada, and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, Chief Justice of the so-called “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan”.

According to the ICC, both men have exercised de facto authority in Afghanistan since at least August 15, 2021.

The applications were made for the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds under Article 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute.

On July 8, 2025, ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II issued arrest warrants against Akhundzada and Haqqani.

The Chamber found reasonable grounds to believe that each suspect bears responsibility for ordering, inducing or soliciting the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds against girls, women and other persons perceived as not conforming with the Taliban’s policies on gender, gender identity or expression.

The Chamber also found grounds concerning persecution on political grounds against persons perceived by the Taliban as “allies of girls and women”.

The ICC Prosecutor’s Office subsequently submitted two additional applications for arrest warrants on March 6, 2025 against Habibullah Agha, Acting Minister of Education, and Neda Mohammad Nadim, Acting Minister of Higher Education.

Welcoming the issuance of the additional warrants, ICC Deputy Prosecutor Nazhat Shameem Khan said the development represented further vindication of the rights of Afghan women and girls, particularly their right to education.

“The issuance of the two additional arrest warrants in the Situation of Afghanistan is a further vindication of the rights of Afghan women and girls, particularly their right to education. Education is a fundamental human right that must be enjoyed by all. Afghan women and girls deserve accountability for the severe deprivation of their rights and freedoms,” she said.

The ICC said the warrants also recognise the rights and lived experiences of people whom the Taliban perceive as failing to conform with their ideological expectations concerning gender identity or expression, including members of the LGBTQI+ community, as well as people whom the Taliban perceive as allies of girls and women.

The Office of the Prosecutor further welcomed the judges’ finding that gender persecution encompasses systematic and institutionalised forms of harm.

According to the ICC, the arrest warrants collectively demonstrate its continuing commitment to pursuing accountability for gender-based crimes, including gender persecution in Afghanistan.

The ICC Prosecutor’s Office noted that its Policy on the Crime of Gender Persecution recognises the complex nature of victimisation and that acts of gender persecution may involve different forms of harm and are not necessarily manifested through sexual or physical violence.

“These warrants highlight the profound harm caused by the imposition of institutional systems of discrimination,” the ICC said.

Deputy Prosecutor Khan described the situation of Afghan women and girls as one of the gravest examples of gender persecution.

“The plight of Afghan women and girls is one of the gravest examples of gender persecution. Afghan women and girls are systematically discriminated against, on the basis of their gender. They deserve justice,” she said.

The ICC Office of the Prosecutor said it would continue investigating allegations of gender persecution by the de facto authorities in Afghanistan.

It added that investigations also cover allegations of persecution of the Afghan civilian population on other grounds, including political, ethnic and religious grounds.

The latest ICC statement therefore underlines that the arrest warrants issued against Akhundzada and other senior Taliban officials form part of an ongoing judicial process concerning alleged crimes against humanity in Afghanistan, particularly the systematic deprivation of the rights and freedoms of women and girls.

The Court’s proceedings against the Taliban leadership are being pursued under the ICC’s investigation into the Situation in Afghanistan, with the Prosecutor’s Office continuing to examine alleged crimes falling within the Court’s jurisdiction.

 

Advertisement

A Russian Road Show for Afghan Taliban held in Moscow

DND Report: The statement by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation S.V. Lavrov at the Eighth Meeting of the Moscow Format Consultations on Afghanistan, Moscow, 5 October 2026, was an excellent achievement for the Afghan Taliban regime as he said that the national government that came to power, headed by the Taliban Movement, brought the country’s territory under control and, it must be acknowledged, is governing it quite successfully.

Possibly, His Excellency Lavrov forgot that Afghan Taliban did not come through any election or Jirga decision and only through a contract with the United States and through guns, not votes. Neither is this regime all-inclusive nor approved by the people of Afghanistan. The so-called Interim Government of Afghan Taliban is still interim even after five years have passed, as they did not hold any election or Jirga to get the approval of the public, nor included representatives of other ethnic groups and women in the government.

Moreover, H.E. Lavrov added that Afghan security forces are waging an uncompromising fight against the Islamic State and other terrorist groups. Hundreds of militants have been eliminated, and a number of high-profile terrorist attacks have been thwarted, including those targeting foreign nationals and diplomatic missions. These observations are also contrary to facts, as Islamic State and Afghan Taliban, since the last three years, have demarcated regions for influence and they closely operate together, and Afghan Taliban are officially hosting UN-proscribed terror groups such as TTP, BLA, Majeed Brigade and many more—almost 20 terror groups are operating from Afghanistan, as mentioned by several UN reports on Regional Security. One can justify Russia for pleasing Afghan Taliban so much because Russia wants a peaceful relation with Afghan Taliban so it can keep itself safe from the wrath of Afghan Taliban, who use terrorism, particularly suicide bombers, as ‘diplomatic leverage’ against neighbouring states. There is no doubt that Russia can also use Afghan Taliban foot soldiers against Ukraine as they are best hired guns and mercenaries, and any country can hire them even without global bidding on the dark web, rather just having a closed-door meeting with them.

The statement of H.E. Lavrov is not accepted by those in Pakistan who cover the Afghan issue and who know Afghanistan better than any diplomat or foreigner. One of such persons is Hassan Khan, one of the most respected journalists and writers in Pakistan, who has been covering the Afghan issue since ages. He, in one of his X messages, commented on the October 5, 2026, meeting of the Moscow Format Consultations on Afghanistan. Titled “Of Moscow Format & Taliban Laundry!”, his X message says that Moscow Format Consultations on Afghanistan have virtually become a laundry for Afghan Taliban with the blessings of Russia. His message adds as:

Russia, who till yesterday were convinced of Taliban regime providing safe havens to terrorist networks and—by Moscow’s own assessment—harbouring 6,000 to 7,000 TTP hardcore fighters posing threat to regional security—preferred a cat-silence over the emerging threats from Taliban’s Afghanistan. Russian FM Sergey Lavrov’s Moscow Format speech means Russia appears to be fully satisfied with Taliban regime’s actions against ISKP, ignoring Taliban policy of providing a permissive environment to terror networks to use Afghan soil freely. No mention of minorities, restrictions on women and girls, or religious and jihadi indoctrination shows Moscow is now pushing under the rug its own assessments & warnings about extremist networks operating from Afghan soil. From Moscow Format meeting, it appears Russia is more interested in pulling Afghanistan into its geopolitical orbit than confronting the security and human rights record of Taliban Regime. For neighbouring countries, terrorism emanating from Afghanistan is a big challenge.

His detailed message also includes that Russia has let down the Moscow Format by failing to address terrorism, an issue of great importance for neighbouring countries, and said that regional security cannot be reduced to ISKP alone while other terrorist networks operate in a permissive environment on Afghan soil.

While criticizing the ‘the new-found selective approach of Russia’, he said this approach has a direct human cost for Pakistan. It is pertinent to mention that in 2026 alone, terrorist attacks emanating from Afghan soil resulted in 1,327 Pakistanis martyred and 2,484 injured, while 1,865 terrorists have been eliminated. Pakistan has identified 260 Afghan nationals killed while involved in terrorist activity inside Pakistan.

Pakistan’s delegation headed by Ambassador Muhammad Sadiq showed the mirror to participants at 8th ‘Moscow Format Consultations’ on Afghanistan, highlighting how the Afghan regime is spreading terrorism globally by boldly telling everybody sitting in the meeting that terrorism remains at the core of Afghanistan’s problems, with roots in the nexus between the Taliban Regime and terrorist groups, including the TTP, BLA, ETIM, ISKP, Al Qaeda and their affiliates, that operate with impunity on Afghan soil.

One can understand that Afghan Taliban are needed by Russia due to its constant war with Ukraine and that is the reason that Russia, being the only state on earth, has recognized the terror regime of Afghan Taliban, but Moscow should not be so blunt as to call murderers of Pakistani people an ‘excellent achievement for Afghan Taliban regime’ when the Pakistani delegation was sitting there. One can hope that Pakistan would not attend a ‘Roadshow for Taliban’ next year in Moscow.

 

Advertisement

Ambassador Sadiq showed the mirror to participants at 8th ‘Moscow Format Consultations’ on Afghanistan, highlighting how the Afghan regime is spreading terrorism globally

Monitoring Desk: Pakistan’s Special Representative for Afghanistan, Muhammad Sadiq, showed the mirror to the Afghan Taliban at the eighth meeting of the ‘Moscow Format Consultations’ on Afghanistan, held today, by boldly telling everybody sitting in the meeting that terrorism remains at the core of Afghanistan’s problems, with roots in the nexus between the Taliban Regime and terrorist groups, including the TTP, BLA, ETIM, ISKP, Al Qaeda and their affiliates, that operate with impunity on Afghan soil.

Ambassador Sadiq showed mirror to Afghan Taliban at 8th meeting of the ‘Moscow Format Consultations’ on Afghanistan

It is pertinent to mention that the opening statement by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, S.V. Lavrov, was highly appreciative of the Taliban regime, stating that the Taliban are governing Afghanistan quite successfully and waging an uncompromising fight against the Islamic State and other terrorist groups. It may be mentioned that Russian Federation is the only country that has recognized Afghan Taliban regime.

In his statement, Muhammad Sadiq expressed what the realities are and what Pakistan is facing today from the Afghan border. He said that the situation is worsened by external actors and spoilers who support proxies inside Afghanistan to target Pakistan and other countries in the region, which remain highly vulnerable to destabilizing threats caused by terrorism, drug smuggling, illegal migration, and human trafficking.

Ambassador Sadiq showed mirror to Afghan Taliban at 8th meeting of the ‘Moscow Format Consultations’ on Afghanistan

He informed participants that Pakistan joined the regional countries after the arrival of the Taliban in Kabul in 2021 in the efforts to help stabilize the situation in Afghanistan and address the humanitarian needs of the people of Afghanistan. He informed participants that Islamabad engaged at the highest level, facilitated humanitarian relief efforts, and provided visas to vulnerable Afghans. Pakistan also extended trade and transit incentives to support the Afghan economy, participated in regional initiatives and connectivity projects, and remained at the forefront of efforts to facilitate Afghanistan’s integration into the international comity.

Ambassador Sadiq showed mirror to Afghan Taliban at 8th meeting of the ‘Moscow Format Consultations’ on Afghanistan

However, he said that despite these efforts, Afghanistan stands at a critical juncture, facing a deteriorating humanitarian crisis and grappling with multiple challenges. The top of them are terrorism, the issue of counterterrorism, ensuring women’s rights and girls’ education, and promoting inclusivity.

He stated that continuing restrictions on women and girls, the absence of any meaningful efforts to ensure broad-based governance, and the lack of progress on counterterrorism commitments not only impede Afghanistan’s long-term development and stability, but they also threaten regional security and undermine our collective efforts towards regional peace and prosperity.

He stated that five years into the Taliban rule, Pakistan faces the most serious security threat. Over the last three years alone, more than 4,700 innocent Pakistanis have lost their lives to terrorism emanating from Afghanistan. No country would tolerate such a situation.

“Thousands of innocent Pakistani civilians and security personnel have been martyred in the last few years as a result of terrorist attacks planned, financed, supported and carried out from Afghan soil. Taliban Regime is complicit in this. No responsible state can remain passive when its security is repeatedly undermined and its people are viciously targeted. Pakistan’s counterterrorism operations are conducted in response to the terrorist attacks being perpetrated from Afghan soil. These operations are precise, intelligence-based and defensive in nature,” he maintained.

He said that Pakistan’s actions are in exercise of its right to self-defence, to ensure the safety and security of its citizens. These actions are directed solely against the terrorist outfits based in Afghanistan that pose a threat to the region and beyond.

“Pakistan has been, and will continue to be, taking all appropriate measures to uphold the safety and security of its citizens in accordance with international law, and based on the principles of necessity and as a measure of last resort. All measures taken by Pakistan constitute legitimate defensive actions against sanctuaries and bases used for planning, training and launching terrorist attacks inside Pakistan, and the scale and scope of Islamabad’s actions represent restraint, particularly in light of the severity of the challenge we face”, emphasized Pakistan’s position.

He said that Pakistan desires peace and stability in the region and has remained patiently engaged in political and diplomatic efforts aimed at addressing the menace of terrorism emanating from Afghan soil. However, it is unfortunate that Pakistan’s numerous goodwill gestures and highly responsible approach were misconstrued, resulting in increased terrorist attacks from Afghan soil, with the active support and backing of the Taliban Regime.

He stated that Pakistan expected the Taliban Regime would take concrete and verifiable actions against those terrorist groups. Regrettably, they failed to act in complete disregard for the legitimate security concerns of Pakistan and other countries. We hope that the Taliban will honor their commitments made to the international community.

 

Advertisement